14 / 100

The Racial/Cultural Identity Developmental (RCID) Model proposed by Sue and Sue (1998) is not a comprehensive theory of personality, but rather a conceptual framework to aid therapists in understanding development of culturally diverse client’s attitudes and behaviors. This model defines five stages of development that oppressed people experience as they struggle to understand themselves in terms of their own culture, the dominant culture, and the oppressive relationship between the two cultures: conformity, dissonance, resistance and immersion, introspective, and integrative awareness (Sue & Sue, 2016). 

Apply this model to a cultural group selected from one of the following minority groups:

  1. African-American
  2. Asian- American and Pacific Islander
  3. American Indian and Alaskan Native
  4. Hispanics/Latino American
  5. Arab American
  6. Jewish American

Identify the five stages for the minority group selected and at each level of identity, discuss these attitudes/beliefs by using observations, examples, experiences, etc. to describe the integral part of the minority group’s identity and how they manifest in their views of a.) the self, b.) others of the same minority, c.) others of another minority, and d.) majority individuals. Utilize the stages to help you in the role of a therapist and better understand your minority client. Use APA style to submit this paper.

Barbershop Project (100 point

The barbershop often functions as the public square within the Black American community and is considered sacred space. It is the idea place to experience the heart of a community.

Select a people group other than your own and visit their “barbershop.” Write a report on your experience.

1. Self-Awareness: Describe your internal experience. For example, what aspects made you feel comfortable or uncomfortable? Did you feel welcomed? Were you excited or nervous? How did you manage your anxieties?

2.Understanding Others: Describe your observations of those at the “barbershop.” For example, what did you noticed in their style of communication and body language? How did they interact with each other? What were some of the main topics of conversations? How did they handle consensus and disagreement?

3.Professional Development: What did you learn that might make a difference in your work as a Helping Professional? How will this experience prepare you to work with culturally diverse clients?

Person-of-the-Therapist Self Study (100 Points)

  1. Provide an in-depth discussion on your personal development as a culturally competent clinician. How have your multiple cultural identities and experiences (e.g., race, age, class, gender, sexual orientation, spiritual orientation, etc.) shaped who you are and your way of being in the world?
  2. Outline your relevant family/individual history.
  3. Identify what you were taught about your own culture and the culture of others. Discuss any stereotypes and prejudices adopted.
  4. Include where you learned these messages(e.g., family, school, media, workplace, etc.).
  5. Describe how these messages will impact your work with diverse clients.
  6. Identify growth areas as a culturally competent clinician.

The System Summary assignments (11 total) are designed to help you become an active learner through consistent immersion in the concepts taught in this course. More specifically, they are designed to assess how well you are able to apply the theoretical models of individual counseling and psychotherapy. 

Create a word document and copy and paste the information below into the document. Address each element and submit the document here. 

SYSTEM: Psychoanalytic Therapy

MAJOR LEADER(S):

THEORY OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY (WHAT GOES WRONG?- What does this theory say about how disorders develop?)

THEORY OF BALANCED HEALTH (WHAT GOES RIGHT?- What does this theory say about the process of normal development?)

ASSESSMENT METHOD (How are problems assessed/measured?)

TREATMENT METHOD:

MECHANISM (The “HOW”) OF CHANGE:

GOALS/OUTCOMES:

Length: ( Minimum of 4 pages double-spaced 12 point Times New Roman font- with references in APA 7 style) Go to Explore to learn about APA 7 style or see examples posted in Announcements.

Major goal: Hone your professional writing skills. In addition to demonstrating knowledge of each theory, write in a professional manner- 3rd person- no use of “I” statements, no grammar, spelling, or sentence structure errors. Check out the Writing lab and APA Workshop in Explore).

RB-HRM-Exec Pay and Benefits

1. Discuss the differences between qualified and non-qualified benefits plans. 
2. Discuss the difference between a defined contribution and a defined benefit plan. 
3. What are the components of executive pay and what additional pay and benefits may be offered to an executive taking an expatriate assignment.

Research and write a short paper (2-3 pages) on a company that has a clear strategy based on social and ethical sustainability. What are the impacts to the workforce?

Use APA style and cite your sources.

Rubric

Paper: Leadership

Paper: Leadership
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvided leadership infrastructure of the company20.0 pts Exemplary- Demonstrates an advanced understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and clearly identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 18.0 pts Mastery- Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 16.0 pts Proficient- Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the primary thesis of the paper however competencies/ outcomes to be achieved are not clearly defined 14.0 pts Emerging- Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- The paper does not reflect an understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyzed workforce strategies20.0 pts Exemplary- Demonstrates an advanced understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and clearly identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 18.0 pts Mastery- Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the primary thesis of the paper that sparks the interest of the reader and identifies competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 16.0 pts Proficient- Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the primary thesis of the paper however competencies/ outcomes to be achieved are not clearly defined 14.0 pts Emerging- Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- The paper does not reflect an understanding of the primary thesis of the paper and does not identify the competencies/ outcomes to be achieved20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking/ Analytical Skills20.0 pts Exemplary- Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; consistently demonstrates the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 18.0 pts Mastery- Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues identified; demonstrates the use of critical thinking/analytical skills 16.0 pts Proficient- Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; minimal demonstration of the use of critical thinking/ analytical skills 14.0 pts Emerging- Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified; demonstrates little or no use of critical thinking/analysis skill 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectation-Does not present any critical thinking/ analysis20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUtilization of Research20.0 pts Exemplary- Supplements paper with relevant and extensive research into the body of the paper 18.0 pts Mastery- Supplements paper with relevant research into the body of the paper 16.0 pts Proficient- Supplements paper with limited research into the body of the paper 14.0 pts Emerging- Minimally supplements paper with research into the body of the paper 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectation- Does not include relevant research into the body of the paper20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality and Organization of the writing20.0 pts Exemplary- The paper is extremely well organized, makes excellent transitions from point to point, no spelling or grammatical errors and all references correctly cited Paper follows APA format 18.0 pts Mastery- The paper is generally well organized with relatively smooth transitions from point to point; rare number of spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not cited. Paper follows APA format correctly cited 16.0 pts Proficient- The paper is organized with somewhat smooth transitions from point to point; under3 spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not cited properly. Paper mostly follows APA format. 14.0 pts Emerging- The paper is minimally well organized with minimally acceptable transitions from point to point; several spelling and/or grammatical errors or references not correctly indicated. Minimally follows APA format. 0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectation-20.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0
Get your assignment done from $10 page.